> On Jan. 22, 2016, 8:16 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > Why did you make this change?
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     I think the main reason should be, after optimistic offer phase 1 is 
> done, we will have two types of revocable resource: usage slack 
> (oversubscription resources) and allocation slack.

Qian is spot on: we should not use oversubscribed and revocable interchangeably.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42633/#review115807
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 22, 2016, 1:24 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42633/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 1:24 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 18f77bcf596c2ee17b4e407fac4367b0c737ce82 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42633/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to