-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42674/#review115959
-----------------------------------------------------------



I saw that many test cases are using busybox, why only updating this one's 
image? Is it possible to update all busybox to alpine? As the alpine was built 
around musl libc and BusyBox. The image is only 5 MB in size and has access to 
a package repository that is much more complete than other BusyBox based images.

- Guangya Liu


On 一月 23, 2016, 12:02 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42674/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 一月 23, 2016, 12:02 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Replaced busybox with alpine in docker tests.
> Busybox is currently causing issues with Docker daemon with btrfs backed 
> (https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/16755), which is the default on 
> CentOS 7.
> Tested CentOS and Ubuntu 14.04 with alpine and all Docker tests passed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 81ab3625a69644d9659d484f3c605aaa5a10b397 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_tests.cpp 
> 9583070d64e96f5a57db62b3fb69073ecc5b502b 
>   src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp 3606ce46bfa283ad0d5239fc25e02c5a9f8d1a53 
>   src/tests/hook_tests.cpp 152984b01069acd4cf195bfce58835f0304a97f2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42674/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to