-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42835/#review116695
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 1341)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42835/#comment177765>

    Should `any more non-revocable` be `any more non-reserved`?


- Qian Zhang


On Jan. 27, 2016, 9:31 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42835/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 27, 2016, 9:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Eventually, we will also want to offer unreserved resources as revocable 
> beyond
> the role's quota. In the short term, we do not offer unreserved, non-revocable
> resources beyond a role's quota.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> fa9939700ff44911b9d149a391677b3eb07577ae 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 7d5eed4dd4ad2d23e925d5cac73675752b016086 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42835/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Park
> 
>

Reply via email to