-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/#review117813
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 182)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/#comment179075>

    Do we need to update the comments to `recovered agents`?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 183)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/#comment179076>

    Just some of my thinking, I think that here the variable 
`expectedAgentCount` is better than `recoveredAgentCount`, because here the 
allocator is `expecting` to get a `desired` number of agents gets recovered 
before proceed.



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 186)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/#comment179077>

    what about the comments here for `expected agents`? need update?


- Guangya Liu


On Feb. 2, 2016, 2:54 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 2, 2016, 2:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4443
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4443
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/allocator.hpp e163669c9c4e4c98572968f18987704b60722a79 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> 581eaad376e7b2febe0b6359014617b935a677a3 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 1f0c440565ee0f9926d168734df30fd740a53f88 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 1a07d69016407e5aad2209586da37fecbcddb765 
>   src/master/master.cpp 98441a543611d4083b2495ee103f0ab5e2187e83 
>   src/tests/allocator.hpp 206e9ac3a83038a691f7929bdd627042b0f363b0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43091/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to