> On Feb. 1, 2016, 7:57 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > What is the use case you want to test here? Specifically, why do you test 
> > *both* resume paths simulataneously? Will the outcome of the test change if 
> > you remove one of those?

This is the test case for https://reviews.apache.org/r/42535 ; without r42535, 
this test will crash.


- Klaus


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/#review117197
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 21, 2016, 2:27 p.m., Klaus Ma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 21, 2016, 2:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, and Joris Van 
> Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added test case for allocator recover with Quota.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 953712149bd951789beb29c72779c4ac65aa48dc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check GTEST_FILTER="HierarchicalAllocatorTest.RecoverWithQuota" (CHECK() 
> failed without fix)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Klaus Ma
> 
>

Reply via email to