> On Feb. 1, 2016, 7:57 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > What is the use case you want to test here? Specifically, why do you test > > *both* resume paths simulataneously? Will the outcome of the test change if > > you remove one of those?
This is the test case for https://reviews.apache.org/r/42535 ; without r42535, this test will crash. - Klaus ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/#review117197 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 21, 2016, 2:27 p.m., Klaus Ma wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 21, 2016, 2:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, and Joris Van > Remoortere. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added test case for allocator recover with Quota. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp > 953712149bd951789beb29c72779c4ac65aa48dc > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42589/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make > make check GTEST_FILTER="HierarchicalAllocatorTest.RecoverWithQuota" (CHECK() > failed without fix) > > > Thanks, > > Klaus Ma > >
