-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43367/#review119436
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/fetcher_cache_tests.cpp (lines 194 - 196)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43367/#comment180810>

    // In some fetcher cache tests, we want to find out if concurrent execution 
of
    // launching taks works, settling the clock will serializes this, thus we 
prefer to
    // reduce `allocation_interval` to speed up test cases here.


- Guangya Liu


On 二月 17, 2016, 9:54 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43367/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 二月 17, 2016, 9:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Benjamin Bannier, and Bernd 
> Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4628
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4628
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Speed up FetcherCache test cases by reduce allocation_interval.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/fetcher_cache_tests.cpp fc89be46bc4cca81f6f3f5072539d3dae26f7c8f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43367/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> In this patch, we use 500ms instead of the default allocation_interval 1s. If 
> the test cases depends on getting offers from master multiple times, this 
> patch could reduce the offer waiting time and speed up them. 
> 
> Before
> ```
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalUncached (943 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalCached (1612 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.CachedFallback (906 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalUncachedExtract (940 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalCachedExtract (1719 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.SimpleEviction (3635 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.FallbackFromEviction (2518 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.RemoveLRUCacheEntries (3653 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpCachedSerialized (2632 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpCachedConcurrent (1227 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpMixed (1129 ms)
> 
> ```
> 
> After
> ```
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalUncached (979 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalCached (1510 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.CachedFallback (853 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalUncachedExtract (816 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.LocalCachedExtract (1715 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.SimpleEviction (2720 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.FallbackFromEviction (2119 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheTest.RemoveLRUCacheEntries (2847 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpCachedSerialized (2233 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpCachedConcurrent (1211 ms)
> [       OK ] FetcherCacheHttpTest.HttpMixed (1106 ms)
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to