> On March 17, 2016, 7:48 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > src/cli/execute.cpp, line 241
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44934/diff/2/?file=1302214#file1302214line241>
> >
> >     The default value of `containerizer` is `mesos`, do we need to check 
> > this?
> >     
> >     What about make the logic as this? This will involve less code change 
> > and the logic may be more clear?
> >     
> >     // Do not touch old dockerImage logic.
> >     if (dockerImage.isSome()) {
> >       old logic here;
> >     }
> >     
> >     if (appcImage.isSome() && containerizer == "mesos") {
> >       ContainerInfo containerInfo;
> >       containerInfo.set_type(ContainerInfo::MESOS);
> >       ContainerInfo::MesosInfo mesosInfo;
> >     
> >       Image::Appc appc;
> >     
> >       appc.set_name(appcImage.get());
> >     
> >       // TODO(jojy): Labels are hard coded right now.
> >       // Consider adding label flags for customization.
> >       Label arch;
> >       arch.set_key("arch");
> >       arch.set_value("amd64");
> >     
> >       Label os;
> >       os.set_key("os");
> >       os.set_value("linux");
> >     
> >       Labels labels;
> >       labels.add_labels()->CopyFrom(os);
> >       labels.add_labels()->CopyFrom(arch);
> >     
> >       appc.mutable_labels()->CopyFrom(labels);
> >     
> >       Image mesosImage;
> >       
> >       mesosImage.set_type(Image::APPC);
> >       mesosImage.mutable_appc()->CopyFrom(appc);
> >       
> >       mesosInfo.mutable_image()->CopyFrom(mesosImage);
> >       
> >       containerInfo.mutable_mesos()->CopyFrom(mesosInfo);
> >     
> >       task.mutable_container()->CopyFrom(containerInfo);
> >     }
> 
> Jojy Varghese wrote:
>     Then we will have to repeat the `if (containerizer == "mesos")` for both 
> dockerImage case and appcImage case. By seperating the logic by cotainerizer, 
> we now can add more image types into the "mesos" containerizer block (say OCI 
> image).
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     Yes, that's also my concern when I open this issue, I think it is ok to 
> keep your current logic.
>     
>     The logic of checking `containerizer.empty()` should be removed?

We could remove that but the idea is that the block can be cleanly separated 
out now to a method (say `handleContainerizer`) that handles the containerizers.


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44934/#review123991
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 17, 2016, 6:54 a.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44934/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 17, 2016, 6:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated mesos-execute to add support for Appc.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cli/execute.cpp ed42cb568f3d16856f48b3bbd354cb2b0fb83e8e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44934/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with various Appc images.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to