-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45439/#review126395
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [45439, 44364, 44366, 44365, 44363, 44361, 44360, 44779, 
44778, 44777, 44776]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 44778

Error:
2016-03-31 18:33:48 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/44778/diff/raw/ 
[1015/1015] -> "44778.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/common/parse.hpp:87
error: src/common/parse.hpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/12245/console

- Mesos ReviewBot


On March 31, 2016, 4:48 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45439/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2016, 4:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Rob Todd, and Vikrama Ditya.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4625
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4625
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The current implementation includes some code for generic device
> isolation. Once we start isolating more devices, we should abstract
> this out and figure out an architecture to support "sub-device"
> isolation.
> 
> This was joint work with Rob Todd from Nvidia <rt...@nvidia.com>.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/devices/gpus/nvidia.hpp 
> 1e17df1f7d1daf913e0c03e0290dd85b51c2ade0 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/devices/gpus/nvidia.cpp 
> c2cdc8fde7a85741be6494ea664d3719d1f13a43 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45439/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test to come in subsequent patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Klues
> 
>

Reply via email to