----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46187/#review128916 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/launcher/http_command_executor.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46187/#comment192356> Looking at slave::statusUpdate() code there are several scenarios where the slave ignores a status update sent by the executor; this means this executor could end up not terminating forever. Can you do the following: --> Enque a message in the queue to self terminate after some timeout (you can use the delay() function) to be safe. --> Add a TODO that we do this to be safe and also because slave sometimes doesn't ACK a status update. Link to a ticket that fixes the slave status update semantics to always ACK a status update sent by an executor. sounds good? - Vinod Kone On April 14, 2016, 5:17 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/46187/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 14, 2016, 5:17 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3558 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3558 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Terminate when receiving the ACK of terminal status update. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/launcher/http_command_executor.cpp > ad484e0e6f5067b6c166111c91b1ff1e8c05d9ac > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46187/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Qian Zhang > >
