> On May 10, 2016, 4:50 p.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp, line 121
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47052/diff/1/?file=1374432#file1374432line121>
> >
> >     I must have missed the context on this change -- we haven't upgraded 
> > the Windows dependency on ZK, have we? Or at least, I haven't seen anything 
> > in my review dashboard about it. So, it seems like htis should still 
> > interfere with `UUID::random`?
> >     
> >     For my own education, can you please comment a bit on why this `#undef` 
> > is no longer necessary?

Zookeeper used to define random as rand. Initialy we were just trying to avoid 
the compilation error by #udef ... Now we are defining a proper random() 
function in Zookeeper via the patch.


- Daniel


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47052/#review132475
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2016, 6:05 a.m., Daniel Pravat wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47052/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2016, 6:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Alex Clemmer, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Windows: [1/2] Added `os::random`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp 
> 0f71f66d3efed7513ce407dde5b56368747c8e70 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp 
> a7a59e78575e1456b4e14d18ac97f51dd23d794e 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows/os.hpp 
> 261768eace6ab09956f4a80e1ec5dba988d831e1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47052/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> OSX: make 
> Windows: build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel Pravat
> 
>

Reply via email to