> On June 16, 2016, 1:11 a.m., zhou xing wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp, line 1371
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/48596/diff/4/?file=1420195#file1420195line1371>
> >
> > for some of the set_xxx or update_xxx method, we do not need
> > contentType, we keep this param only for consistency?
Yes, I think we could add `/* */` to contentType which similiar to
```
Future<Response> Master::Http::frameworks(
const Request& request,
const Option<string>& /*principal*/) const
```
- haosdent
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48596/#review137901
-----------------------------------------------------------
On June 15, 2016, 5:14 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48596/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 15, 2016, 5:14 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, zhou xing, Jay Guo, and Vinod Kone.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-5486
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5486
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Implemented v1::master::Call::SET_LOGGING_LEVEL.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/master/http.cpp db625f0d656f207a89fcc14b18ae2fc31d30e673
> src/master/master.hpp a0944ddccd3a4b33458cd2489bb5fcdbbdc55720
> src/tests/api_tests.cpp 3a482ca2a640b3f3e3b08a80ac84068d7e9ff8b0
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48596/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> haosdent huang
>
>