> On July 11, 2016, 4:31 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 4778
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/48313/diff/6/?file=1435277#file1435277line4778>
> >
> >     Should we also remove the target resources in the case when target and 
> > checkpointed resources are the same?

Yes, you are right. We should since we do not need the target resources in 
either case.


> On July 11, 2016, 4:31 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > src/slave/state.cpp, line 712
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/48313/diff/6/?file=1435279#file1435279line712>
> >
> >     Can we avoid reusing the same variable name? How about `infoPath` and 
> > `targetPath`?

Actually, I consolidated the 2 variables into `path` based on a previous 
comment but I think keeping them separate make following the code easier.


- Anindya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48313/#review141657
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 1, 2016, 9:39 p.m., Anindya Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48313/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 1, 2016, 9:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Neil Conway and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5448
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5448
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When the agent receives CheckpointedResourcesMessage, we store the
> target checkpoint on disk. On successful create and destroy of
> persistent volumes as a part of handling this messages, we commit
> the checkpoint on the disk, and clear the target checkpoint.
> 
> However, incase of any failure we do not commit the checkpoint to
> disk, and exit the agent. When the agent restarts and there is a
> target checkpoint present on disk which differs from the committed
> checkpoint, we retry to sync the target and committed checkpoint.
> On success, we reregister the agent with the master, but in case it
> fails, we do not commit the checkpoint and the agent exists.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/paths.hpp 339e539863c678b6ed4d4670d75c7ff4c54daa79 
>   src/slave/paths.cpp 03157f93b1e703006f95ef6d0a30afae375dcdb5 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 484ba758b4c87935aabd2f76a0e654a3c6d09167 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp da643e6e50b2f313705d2f862c961291aa5d2f22 
>   src/slave/state.hpp 0de2a4ee4fabaad612c4526166157b001c380bdb 
>   src/slave/state.cpp 9cec0868b1187ed3ccac7f065e8a21c2f52178d9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48313/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anindya Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to