----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49921/#review141847 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/CMakeLists.txt (line 51) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49921/#comment207245> Is this review relevant anymore? In #49688 it looks like we're using a much more recent version of this file, and I don't see un-commenting these files as part of the diff? Based on what I see here, it seems like we should probably discard this review and/or merge it with that last one. Thoughts? - Alex Clemmer On July 11, 2016, 8:44 p.m., Srinivas Brahmaroutu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/49921/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 11, 2016, 8:44 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alex Clemmer and Joseph Wu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-5792 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5792 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Fixed mesos tests to run 723 test on Unix. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/CMakeLists.txt 3c530631d22aa1cfdc2c600112059601bba7d6b7 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49921/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > cmake .. && make > src/tests/mesos-tests (runs 723 tests with no failures) > I did not enable any module that has even a single failue. There are many > more tests that are passing. > > > Thanks, > > Srinivas Brahmaroutu > >
