> On Aug. 1, 2016, 1:57 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystem.cpp, lines 85-97
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49828/diff/10/?file=1458774#file1458774line85>
> >
> >     Suppose we use `cgroups/cpu` as isolation first, then restart the agent 
> > with `cgroups/cpu,cgroups/mem` in `isolation` flag. For those recovered 
> > containers, because they don't appear in the memory subsystem before, they 
> > should return `Failure` here.

I think in memory subsystem (https://reviews.apache.org/r/49851/diff), you 
already return `Failure` in `update()`/`usage()`, right?

And actually I think we do not need to care about the case that agent is 
restarted with a different sets of isolators at this moment, because currently 
Mesos does not officially support it yet. In future, we may support it with 
checkpointing what isolators (including their version) have been used to launch 
the container, but for now, we do not need to worry about it.


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49828/#review144282
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 1, 2016, 1:49 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49828/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 1, 2016, 1:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, Qian Zhang, and Zhengju Sha.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5039
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5039
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added default methods implementations for `Subsystem` base class.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystem.hpp 
> 5f52a076a1fa3a21d886cb961ddeed5046a38d7c 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystem.cpp 
> a30ecafcbecc9d3b6eeea2b04dcb4d278750af41 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49828/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to