> On July 29, 2016, 12:44 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/authenticator.cpp, line 57 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50513/diff/1/?file=1455330#file1455330line57> > > > > Why this one is enclosed in underscores? > > Gastón Kleiman wrote: > Added the naming schema to the commit description.
(in https://reviews.apache.org/r/50519/) - Gastón ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50513/#review144082 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 2, 2016, 1:45 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/50513/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 2, 2016, 1:45 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Alexander Rukletsov. > > > Bugs: MESOS-5917 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5917 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > After this change, all libprocess actors should have a distinguishable > ID, making it possible to match the logging output or the output of > the "__process__" enpoint to the source actor. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/collect.hpp > 5a92b72eb7668494dc832ec446a41b3d673a20cc > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/protobuf.hpp > 78ff40ed64c4313dd9daddcf96e1447ad015c734 > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/run.hpp > d141fb0f5f71e24d1652a11dbaa6d2b7c5b70f5f > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/authenticator.cpp > 55e8558a5272cb0447ad9268ad9c7f27e2f30385 > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp > 7f331b812de2f0437838f48e0959441c8e04c358 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50513/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` in OS X and various linux distribution. > > I also looked at the output of the `__process__` endpoint. After this change, > some of the unidentifiable processes have a nicer id now. The goal of this > review chain is to give all processes there an identifiable ID. > > > Thanks, > > Gastón Kleiman > >
