> On Aug. 10, 2016, 7:23 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/examples/persistent_volume_framework.cpp, lines 402-410
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43558/diff/3/?file=1470240#file1470240line402>
> >
> >     Can you give some context on why lowering these speeds up the test? How 
> > much does it speed it up?

Hi, @bmahler The most effective snippet is

```
export MESOS_AUTHENTICATION_TIMEOUT=200ms
```

which we committed before. I test this patch again, seems only bring little 
speed up.

Before apply the patch,

```
[       OK ] ExamplesTest.PersistentVolumeFramework (3505 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ExamplesTest (3510 ms total)
```

After apply the patch,

```
[       OK ] ExamplesTest.PersistentVolumeFramework (2493 ms)
[----------] 1 test from ExamplesTest (2497 ms total)
```

Do you think we should discard this?


- haosdent


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43558/#review145390
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 10, 2016, 5:21 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43558/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 10, 2016, 5:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Benjamin Mahler, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4663
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4663
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Speed up ExamplesTest.PersistentVolumeFramework.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/examples/persistent_volume_framework.cpp 
> fe2837cfffb6dd251ccb9c93197f623d0c55fb36 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43558/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Repeat test in CentOS 7.1
> ```
> sudo ./bin/mesos-tests.sh 
> --gtest_filter="ExamplesTest.PersistentVolumeFramework" --gtest_repeat=200 
> --gtest_break_on_failure
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to