-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51272/#review146399
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/local/local.cpp (lines 343 - 350)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51272/#comment212809>

    I'd suggest we move this logic down below. more readable to me (current 
logic is broken into two pieces).
    ```
    // ...
    if (flags.num_slaves > 1) {
      LOG(WARNING) << ...;
      
      flags.launcher = "posix";
    }
    ```



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp (line 223)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51272/#comment212808>

    I would use the following. Looks more readable to me.
    ```
    if (flags_.launcher != "posix" && flags_.launcher != "windows")
    ```


- Jie Yu


On Aug. 22, 2016, 4:53 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51272/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2016, 4:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Kevin Klues.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactored the agent 'launcher' flag to always have a value.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/local/local.cpp 1e1d246790a0d44d1baf802b903dc4f2bde1ac63 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 77a502f853e3e04ea8e274419544601778be9421 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp 1a006663e7cc58ee548b3dda686cfbac0c240baa 
>   src/slave/flags.cpp 0f2be1700f41b74da4ea1ce699a81ec33cf92a9a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51272/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to