-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51274/#review146431
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launcher.cpp (lines 50 - 64)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51274/#comment212859>

    `+1` on removing `ForContainer` suffix.


- Jie Yu


On Aug. 22, 2016, 4:54 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51274/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2016, 4:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Kevin Klues.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactorings include:
> 
>   * 'buildPathFromHierarchy' was both reimplemented recursively for
>     easy of understanding and renamed to 'buildPathForContainer' in an
>     effort to better capture it's intended use case (i.e., "build a
>     path to be used to represent a container in cgroup subsystems like
>     the freezer"). Ultimately I hope that all isolators use this
>     function to "name" their cgroups/containers.
> 
>   * Added a new function 'getRuntimePathForContainer' that takes a
>     'flags' argument and computes the runtime path using
>     'flags.launcher' rather than having to have a POSIX_LAUNCHER_NAME
>     and LINUX_LAUNCHER_NAME. This was made possibly by making
>     'flags.launcher' always have a value in a previous commit.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launcher.hpp 
> 0eae09515d550a2c71ae1414d4a22943f1d09db9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launcher.cpp 
> 413a8afdc56127a58c9599c436d17d6c98e62434 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/linux_launcher.hpp 
> 8fbe1e9742df85b0fc6de46ac81a0c064c845a63 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/linux_launcher.cpp 
> 7377316776646e3d660086da3c0d5b494ce8ace4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51274/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to