> On Sept. 12, 2016, 5:57 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 372
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51803/diff/3/?file=1496755#file1496755line372>
> >
> >     In genenal I think we should state "Feature X will be deprecated in 
> > version Y in favor of feature Z" to help folks understand the reasoning. In 
> > this case there happens to be difference of opinions on whether this 
> > feature/field should be deprecated in 2.0 (which we can discuss outside 
> > this review) but could you at least in this review add why this is 
> > deprecated and what do you recommend people to do when it is deprecated?

@xujyan, that requires we define the message to support HTTP health check with 
statues. How about let me rephrase the comment here to describe it is not 
supported and may be deprecated in Mesos 2.0?


- haosdent


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51803/#review148536
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 12, 2016, 2 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51803/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2016, 2 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Joseph Wu, Silas Snider, and 
> Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6110
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6110
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ensured `HealthCheck::HTTPCheckInfo` compatible with the old one.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto eb61b6243202464da2307d06d80700f19f9c25d4 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 62231522f4bfddfc6c440a299dd01080cbe25f6a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51803/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to