> On Sept. 15, 2016, 5:56 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > Did you want to fold the minor fix into your original patch to backport? > > Joseph Wu wrote: > Do you mean MESOS-6152? (i.e. `s/fd/owned_fd`) > > I kept the cherry-picks un-squashed to retain history.
Yeah. Maybe Vinod / BenM can chime in regarding squash vs. retain history. - Joris ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51921/#review149085 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 15, 2016, 5:26 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/51921/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 15, 2016, 5:26 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, Greg Mann, Artem > Harutyunyan, and Joris Van Remoortere. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This updates the CHANGELOG to reflect: > * Backporting MESOS-5986 to 0.27.4 and 0.28.3. > * Backporting MESOS-6104 and MESOS-6152 to 0.27.4, 0.28.3, and 1.0.2. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG ef31563e3f4a2ceda598a0ddcc7ad325f64a8538 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51921/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > TODO: Running the 0.27.x, 0.28.x, and 1.0.x branches + backports through an > internal CI... > > > Thanks, > > Joseph Wu > >
