-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51407/#review150235
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp (line 155)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51407/#comment218126>

    This line should be removed. Shephers, please remove this before committing 
if there are no other major problems with the patch.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp (lines 682 - 683)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51407/#comment218127>

    This comment should be deleted. Shephers, please remove this before 
committing if there are no other major problems with the patch.


- Kevin Klues


On Sept. 23, 2016, 9:01 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51407/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 23, 2016, 9:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6204
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6204
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This includes checkpointing both the container pid and the status of
> the container upon exit. This also includes an update to tests to
> account for new 'init' process semantics in a container. That is, the
> name of the init process of the container is now "mesos-containerizer"
> not "sh".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> 16f9e3e92e90fe7f8a0ebd24e567800e1f285bc9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 144b0db501d40d4e0bba12672723616bedd76e7e 
>   src/tests/containerizer/isolator_tests.cpp 
> b4d25e57df7f0e157769c9ae4f7847657c505e78 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51407/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> $ GTEST_FILTER="" make -j check
> $ src/mesos-tests
> $ sudo src/mesos-tests
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Klues
> 
>

Reply via email to