----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52637/#review152019 -----------------------------------------------------------
Can you also update the review description to be more informative than what it is now i.e., around why do we need this new field? include/mesos/master/master.proto (line 314) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52637/#comment220698> s/recovered/recovered_agents to be consistent with other similar fields in this file. - Anand Mazumdar On Oct. 7, 2016, 3:59 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52637/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 7, 2016, 3:59 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Xiaojian Huang. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6177 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6177 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added recovered `AgentID`s in `GetAgents` response. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/master/master.proto d2312dce31f56dd65ac4d0e554b680749da61335 > include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto > 0dc6cca367590ea8e9f22b22b85baa4c11e69b13 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52637/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Zhitao Li > >
