> On Oct. 10, 2016, 3:28 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> > configure.ac, lines 616-617
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51716/diff/3/?file=1517706#file1517706line616>
> >
> >     Not a biggy but maybe it is a good idea to make this better readable / 
> > parseable by creating a local temporary variable.
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     I agree, this is not very readible. I tried to make this more readible, 
> but did not succeed with my limited autoconf/m4 knowledge, so I added a 
> comment explaining what exactly we do here, and a `TODO`,
>     
>         +# We here set up `TEST_DRIVER` to contain an unexpanded automake
>         +# variable name; this allows us to reuse the test runner to run 
> bundled
>         +# 3rdparty checks. The special quoting ensures that this containing a
>         +# space is not expanded by autoconf.
>         +# TODO(bbannier): Make this more readible by using autoconf/m4 magic.
>     
>     Do you think this is sufficient?

Perfectly fine, thanks for trying :)


- Till


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51716/#review151988
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 11, 2016, 8:19 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51716/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 11, 2016, 8:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6140
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6140
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added configure option for Mesos test runner.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac 034bb91bfacd74ce0349685f1760f9784fdc1a18 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51716/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` with `--enable-parallel-test-execution` (OS X, python 2.7.12)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to