----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#review154577 -----------------------------------------------------------
CHANGELOG (line 102) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224192> How about something to annotate what level of bug this is? examples: `Unresolved Critical Issues` maybe someone else has other suggestions. CHANGELOG (line 106) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224193> From the ticket MESOS-5533 seems like a documentation issue. Should we verify with Kapil and lower the priority so we can remove it from this list? CHANGELOG (line 108) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224194> Same here. Let's just fix this and move on. I don't see how this is beneficial to consumers of the change log. CHANGELOG (line 113) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224196> Same here. I understand this is a security issue; however, if we want to report all security issues currently I think We'd have a long long list? - Joris Van Remoortere On Nov. 2, 2016, 3:46 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 2, 2016, 3:46 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG ed78657492eb3a708cdeaf9cf40d0a70270a5699 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > None: not a functional change. > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Rukletsov > >
