-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53351/#review154594
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto (line 32)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53351/#comment224207>

    Nested is implied by the containerId. I would call it 'DEFAULT' in the 
sense that if someone does not specify a class explicitly, it'll be treated as 
DEFAULT.



src/slave/containerizer/composing.hpp (line 71)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53351/#comment224227>

    Let's make this optional and default to None().
    ```
    const Option<ContainerClass>& containerClass = None()
    ```


- Jie Yu


On Nov. 1, 2016, 10:28 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53351/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 1, 2016, 10:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6464
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6464
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A 'ContainerClass' must now be passed to all *nested*
> containerizer->launch() calls in order to specify the class of
> container being launched. For now, we simply have the default nested
> container class (called 'NESTED') in a subsequent commit we will
> introduce the 'DEBUG' class to help classify debug-based nested
> containers that should be launched slightly differently than default
> nested containers.
> 
> The 'ContainerClass' specified is passed through to each isolator in
> 'ContainerConfig' so they have a chance to custiomize their isolation
> policies based on the class as well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto 
> f4c4ad771b5dead4ea3ee7cd1b4383c4dc2359b4 
>   src/slave/containerizer/composing.hpp 
> 68c0523bb96e1078bd95c6094bce04c38c2fc9dd 
>   src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp 
> 0c5489f8dffaf75bce26a042000eaf7376f05ff4 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp 
> 7554446ac51a9063bd52b8b99845c73650740849 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> c4fea8b56c39d5a363f6ea80bd109fd2d3db52d9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 67cc595278f124cdf518d2f4fcfb257439f067e2 
>   src/slave/http.cpp a32aca437cffd52bc2bcde859eedddca2038e3f1 
>   src/tests/api_tests.cpp f87130d7554f98265ff6da39ea1d366839193e85 
>   src/tests/containerizer.hpp d418ecebee155f894187e24549f42497372d8a5f 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp c2208660352e5cf62cec5c7b92ec67fea62aea49 
>   src/tests/containerizer/nested_mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> e6c690c411f57138207044f31b4816bd4090c1b7 
>   src/tests/containerizer/volume_image_isolator_tests.cpp 
> f14a0bd1c44c069c2784638132a08072a2343309 
>   src/tests/containerizer/volume_sandbox_path_isolator_tests.cpp 
> f873e288f72dbecc33b9c1c817688332c0eb3d31 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53351/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make -j check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Klues
> 
>

Reply via email to