> On Nov. 4, 2016, 8:16 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 2115
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53450/diff/2/?file=1553918#file1553918line2115>
> >
> >     I see you changed s/TtyInfo/TTYInfo/
> >     
> >     Is this intentional? I know @bmahler has lamented in the past about 
> > decisions like this. (e.g. `HTTPScheduler` he would prefer to be 
> > `HttpScheduler`).
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     I might be missing context but why do we prefer HttpScheduler to 
> HTTPScheduler? HTTP is an abbrevation, so all caps seems better to me. Note 
> that we have TCPCheckInfo, HTTPCheckInfo, URI, URL, etc protos already.

You'd have to ask @bmahler his thoughts on this. I just know it came up a few 
times during my GPU reviews. For consistency though (since so many other 
protobufs are already written like this), I think it's probably better to leave 
it as ALL CAPS.


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53450/#review154980
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 4, 2016, 12:35 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53450/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2016, 12:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Benjamin Mahler, Jie Yu, and Kevin 
> Klues.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6525
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6525
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added to ContainerInfo because we want to be able to attach to
> containers that are launched without a CommandInfo.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 905a34bb13c2fcd1b22ef4e9605405ef84711c25 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto b72069a6caff0b163d9d9cae45c3caa0b25de38f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53450/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to