> On Nov. 22, 2016, 8:35 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > This didn't have a ship it, I was expecting the test filter changes to be 
> > in place before we committed the changes. Are you working on these now?
> 
> Anand Mazumdar wrote:
>     Looks like there is some disconnect. We had an offline discussion at 
> MesosCon China on this and I remember you agreeing that we can commit these 
> patches with the tests disabled and I can work on the filtering changes in 
> the interim. I have already filed an issue (blocker) yesterday and would 
> start working on it soon: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6623
>     
>     I am happy to revert the patches if this is not what you had in mind.

Sorry about that! It sounds ok to me, as long as we follow up on MESOS-6623 
quickly.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53491/#review156625
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 22, 2016, 12:27 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53491/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 22, 2016, 12:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6466
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6466
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests that rely on filtering HTTP events based on type won't
> work now since the request body is not yet known when `visit()`
> is invoked. These would be fixed as part of a separate JIRA
> issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp c8cd89228eb4e55c9a9655f9de39cb070e14520c 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp 99c27399297e3b04af167029d200d8ac418af2a6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53491/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to