> On Dec. 15, 2016, 10:32 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp, lines 596-599
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54717/diff/2/?file=1583519#file1583519line596>
> >
> >     I would probably just get rid of this check here. It looks to me that 
> > even if we did the check here, things might change in 'attach'. Why bother 
> > checking it here?
> 
> Avinash sridharan wrote:
>     What about the case, where the CNI network is actually not found ? IN 
> that case we should just throw an error and not let the prepare succeed right?

I guess you're right. I think we might need to fail early if the network is 
indeed not found. What I was thinking is that even if it is not found for now, 
it might be found in 'attach'. But I guess this should be extremely rare. Feel 
free to drop the issue. Let's call `getNetworkConfigJson` here.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54717/#review159378
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 14, 2016, 12:28 a.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54717/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 14, 2016, 12:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6567
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6567
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If the `network/cni` isolator sees a cache-miss during the `prepare`
> phase, it will try to look for the CNI network on disk before giving
> up. This allows for the dynamic addition of CNI networks without the
> need for agent restart.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.hpp 
> b8fc755a8dd4757d904f7e97a71d3cf7f29d2033 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp 
> ddb4d33e9ecd0ffd118e8e68cb7ec90346b08049 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54717/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Manual testing with addition of a non-existent CNI configuration.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Avinash sridharan
> 
>

Reply via email to