----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55806/#review162708 -----------------------------------------------------------
On reflection, populating this field from the `unreachable_tasks` metric isn't the best approach, since (a) we want to use the per-framework `unreachable_tasks` field to report more detailed information about unreachable tasks, and (b) the metric is computed from (a), anyway. Hence I'll discard this; new approach is in https://reviews.apache.org/r/55856/ - Neil Conway On Jan. 21, 2017, 11:27 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/55806/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 21, 2017, 11:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, haosdent huang and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Updated webui to display number of unreachable tasks. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/webui/master/static/home.html cf251865e1670beee9532f7c6e1b4dc23e86dbfc > src/webui/master/static/js/controllers.js > 388ca2447716cbc7141da6a20daf2340621a16e8 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55806/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check`, visual inspection. > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
