> On 一月 25, 2017, 9:54 a.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > include/mesos/resources.hpp, lines 332-339
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54836/diff/3/?file=1611725#file1611725line332>
> >
> >     I would've expected:
> >     ```cpp
> >     void allocate(const std::string& role);
> >     void unallocate();
> >     ```
> >     
> >     Could you help me understand what the `bool` from `unallocate` is for?
> >     
> >     If it's simply to indicate whether the function had any effects or
> >     not, `allocate` could also return a `bool`, which returns `false`
> >     when the resources were already allocated for the specified role.

For `allocate`, seems the question here is same as mine above: In which case 
shall we need to overwrite the role for allocation?


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54836/#review162927
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 一月 23, 2017, 1:55 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54836/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 一月 23, 2017, 1:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Jay Guo, Guangya Liu, and Michael 
> Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added helpers to allocate / unallocate Resources.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/resources.hpp c2e6d6680d9687f0bbfb73e84ffb1457072c4412 
>   include/mesos/v1/resources.hpp 98f025b68c818c384a1174ef9b969f5c0776a7f1 
>   src/common/resources.cpp be9bca2063e9f0e60c5faa0142077bea56272e45 
>   src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 8dfb1be35d9f9c6ff69139d055c6b3d3ec475e68 
>   src/v1/resources.cpp da4701c03020ff9c33ef995cd0af437d8827c267 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54836/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Updated the existing allocation test to incorporate the new helper.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to