-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#review163363
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/checks/health_checker.hpp (line 137)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234769>

    we don't typically do `const` for POD types.
    
    s/_agentSpawnsCommandContainer/



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 129)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234776>

    s/build/create/



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (lines 145 - 157)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234773>

    can you inline these?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (lines 426 - 429)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234777>

    why a `.repair()` here?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 435)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234798>

    const & ?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 447)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234780>

    s/this/This/



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 449)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234781>

    s/Agent/agent/



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 480)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234799>

    launch nested container session returns a streaming response, how come you 
are calling `post()` helper here which expects a non-streaming response?
    
    probably one of the reasons why your test is hanging.



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (lines 481 - 485)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234782>

    The identation seems wrong? do we do it like this elsehwhere?
    
    i would've done so
    
    ```
    .after(checkTimeout,
           defer(self(),
                 ...)
    ```



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 531)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234789>

    s/has not returned/timed out/



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (lines 534 - 536)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234790>

    why repair?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 538)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234797>

    why not just return failure?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp (line 562)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234793>

    s/callResponse/response/



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 112)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234794>

    s/resume/Resume/



src/launcher/default_executor.cpp (line 130)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/#comment234795>

    s/stop/Stop/


- Vinod Kone


On Jan. 25, 2017, 12:33 a.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 25, 2017, 12:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent 
> huang, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6280
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6280
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> [WIP] Added support for command health checks to the default executor.
> 
> This is still a work in progress, but I am posting it in order to get some 
> feedback on the general approach.
> 
> Open questions/issues:
> 
>   - The code that handles communication with the Agent is on the 
> `DefaultExecutor`, so the health checker calls `evolve` when serializing the 
> API calls. Should it use the v1 protos instead, and skip the `evolve` call?
>   - CMD health checks for command tasks inherit the env from the executor, 
> but allow overriding env variables. I don't think that inheriting the 
> executor env makes sense for cmd health checks launched by the 
> `DefaultExecutor` - each task can have its own env, so the health check 
> command should inherit the task env and merge it with the one in the check's 
> `CommandInfo`.
>     I added some code that takes the task env from `TaskInfo` and merges it 
> check's env, but I don't think that this is an ideal approach, since it will 
> miss env variables set/modified by containerizers/hooks/isolators. Do you 
> think that it would make sense for all Debug Containers to inherit the 
> environment of the parent container?
>   - There's a TODO for stopping/resuming health checking when the 
> `DefaultExecutor` is disconnected from the agent. After talking to AlexR, I 
> believe that we should do this for all types of checks, not just for `CMD`.
>   - The test that I introduced passes on Linux, but not on macOS, I still 
> have to do some more debugging.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/checks/health_checker.hpp 6e558f2061a9e31157c47d31cb64b3a8568aace3 
>   src/checks/health_checker.cpp 50aa2858e807b27bbab58a3618f5200cfe4eca9e 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp a03794934adb93868734f8cf00b337a1bff9b5ab 
>   src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp debbd3c09b7555145aaf3f62a24d795d1423a269 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55901/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Introduced a new test: `HealthCheckTest.DefaultExecutorCmdHealthCheck`. It 
> passes on Linux, but not on macOS.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gastón Kleiman
> 
>

Reply via email to