> On Feb. 19, 2017, 8:32 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > src/tests/containerizer/nested_mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp, lines 998-1012 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56809/diff/1/?file=1639897#file1639897line998> > > > > Instead of that, can we call 'provisioner->provision' and use > > DockerArchive as the local docker store?
Updated depending on this comment. I move the test to `provisioner_docker_tests.cpp` since containerizer construction method is needed if we want to call `provisioner->provision()`. It is a little more work to be done. Please let me know if it looks complicated and we should change it back. - Gilbert ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56809/#review166047 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 17, 2017, 5:55 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/56809/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 17, 2017, 5:55 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan, Jie Yu, and Kevin Klues. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added test for nested container machine reboot case. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/containerizer/nested_mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp > ea01fe55a28d17105157004d8cf0976202a49b7c > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56809/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Gilbert Song > >
