-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/#review169130
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 278-281 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/#comment241451>

    AFAICT, this is called synchronously, so the callers can ensure they are 
not calling it while paused. having if check here but not in `success` is also 
a bit confusing.



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 375 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/#comment241450>

    



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 381-386 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/#comment241448>

    this looks like a unrelated change?



src/checks/health_checker.cpp
Lines 928 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/#comment241449>

    log message?
    
    more importantly, AFAICT `scheduleNext` is called synchronously from other 
functions so that callers can ensure they are not calling it when paused. so 
this can be a CHECK.


- Vinod Kone


On March 15, 2017, 2:59 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 15, 2017, 2:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent 
> huang, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6280
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6280
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See the summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/checks/health_checker.hpp f1f2834b3429fb00cc49c179fa9a3de328f597b5 
>   src/checks/health_checker.cpp 6c97369fd9a567ba16dd92085bf142d43f71eaf1 
>   src/docker/executor.cpp 6c11320fc40ba1eebdbdf95f0a52ac383646d9f8 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 0ed436faa68e984d0be4e5186138f738bc7f1b52 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp adcc50fb7df91b9f8dff0f583b61e0efcd6da378 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57645/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` in Linux
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gastón Kleiman
> 
>

Reply via email to