----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/#review169729 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/checks/health_checker.cpp Lines 532-534 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/#comment242279> Why is this failure transient? Can the next retry succeed? src/checks/health_checker.cpp Lines 548 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/#comment242280> Why is this failure transient? Can the next retry succeed? src/checks/health_checker.cpp Line 536 (original), 588 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/#comment242275> can we still mention `"-health-check"` to simplify reading the logs? - Alexander Rukletsov On March 22, 2017, 4:24 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 22, 2017, 4:24 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent > huang, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6280 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6280 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/checks/health_checker.hpp 44df544b585b8c9f1138fc69b34b064bae8cc867 > src/checks/health_checker.cpp a26e9b570ea3a0ee775d220a3b523ae7052dad23 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57647/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` in Linux > > > Thanks, > > Gastón Kleiman > >
