> On March 29, 2017, 10:42 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/master/allocator/sorter/drf/sorter.hpp
> > Lines 214-216 (original), 215-217 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57564/diff/1/?file=1662777#file1662777line215>
> >
> >     This comment is no longer accurate, right? We used to store a distinct 
> > structure purely because of the deactivated clients being absent from the 
> > `clients` map. Now that this is no longer the case, it seems like this 
> > patch should be removing this additional data structure (which needs to be 
> > kept in sync) and just storing `Allocation` within Client.
> >     
> >     Won't we need to do this anyway for the hierarchy change? Seems clearer 
> > to me to make that change in this patch.

Right, the comment was stale (although it was removed in the next review in the 
chain anyway); I updated it.

I'll look into splitting the `Allocation` change out into a separate review.


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57564/#review170491
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 13, 2017, 6:04 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57564/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 13, 2017, 6:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> DRFSorter previously removed inactive clients from the `clients`
> collection, and then re-added clients when they were reactivated. This
> resulted in resetting the allocation count for the client, which is
> unfortunate. This scheme would also be more difficult to adapt to
> hierarchical sorting.
> 
> This commit changes DRFSorter to continue to store inactive clients in
> the `clients`; inactive clients are indicated by a new field in the
> `Client` struct, and are omitted from the return value of
> `DRFSorter::sort`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/sorter/drf/sorter.hpp 
> 76329220e1115c1de7810fb69b943c78c078be59 
>   src/master/allocator/sorter/drf/sorter.cpp 
> ed54680cecb637931fc344fbcf8fd3b14cc24295 
>   src/tests/sorter_tests.cpp ec0636beb936d46a253d19322f2157abe95156b6 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57564/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to