----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#review174713 -----------------------------------------------------------
A few thoughts CHANGELOG Lines 51-52 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247929> Can we refer to "pre-1.0" as `0.x`? CHANGELOG Lines 52 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247930> Interoperability between 1.0 masters and 0.28 agents was supported, during live upgrade. CHANGELOG Lines 300 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/#comment247928> s/1.3.0/1.2.1/ ? - Adam B On May 11, 2017, 11:58 a.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 11, 2017, 11:58 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Adam B. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Documented that Mesos 1.3.0, 1.2.1 don't allow old agents to register. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG 31c21e9a69a6e11429b58a7eddecf7746a284530 > docs/upgrades.md 74e74642b411eefb737d575b89a1f206cae62b46 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59198/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Visual inspection, no functional change. > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
