-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58673/#review174988
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




I can fix this up before committing.


3rdparty/stout/include/stout/flags/parse.hpp
Line 96 (original), 96 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58673/#comment248291>

    Presumably a commit splitting mistake.



3rdparty/stout/tests/flags_tests.cpp
Line 983 (original), 983 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58673/#comment248292>

    Presumably a commit splitting mistake.


- Joseph Wu


On May 2, 2017, 2:46 p.m., Jeff Coffler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58673/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 2, 2017, 2:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, John Kordich, Joseph Wu, and 
> Li Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5937
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5937
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added 3rdparty/stout/tests/path_tests.cpp tests to Windows platform,
> but disabled tests that did not pass. Enabled absolute path tests,
> adding tests that were appropriate for the Windows platform.
> 
> Note that, for Windows, absolute paths may not be valid. For example,
> a path like "\\?\abc:file.txt" is not valid. In this case, the
> path::absolute method is undefined; the expectation is that it is
> called with valid paths (absolute or relative, but valid).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/flags/parse.hpp 
> 65edd86372596c2107e9f29cf27301e025e6620e 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp 
> 2d2088aadfa1ea82c59424242671c4fb655dede1 
>   3rdparty/stout/tests/CMakeLists.txt 
> 4bbe713f259e7858d423dcb33956d41e62a915eb 
>   3rdparty/stout/tests/flags_tests.cpp 
> e2681f8f68f6478d4c8a20c1e75ddb050d16b56d 
>   3rdparty/stout/tests/path_tests.cpp 
> 0490d93908566c46a10d91b05790e5a7f2f289bc 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58673/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Passes `make check` on the Linux platform.
> 
> On Windows, the FlagsFileTest.JSONFile now passes, along with new 
> PathTest.Absolute tests that I added due to new path::absolute handling on 
> the Windows platform.
> 
> PS C:\mesos> .\build\3rdparty\stout\tests\Debug\stout-tests.exe 
> --gtest_filter="*FlagsFileTest*"
> Note: Google Test filter = *FlagsFileTest*-
> [==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case.
> [----------] Global test environment set-up.
> [----------] 2 tests from FlagsFileTest
> [ RUN      ] FlagsFileTest.JSONFile
> WARNING: Logging before InitGoogleLogging() is written to STDERR
> W0425 10:05:20.959357 1060440 parse.hpp:97] Specifying an absolute filename 
> to read a command line option out of without using 'file:// is deprecated and 
> will be removed in a future release. Simply adding 'file://' to the beginning 
> of the path should eliminate this warning.
> [       OK ] FlagsFileTest.JSONFile (9 ms)
> [ RUN      ] FlagsFileTest.FilePrefix
> [       OK ] FlagsFileTest.FilePrefix (6 ms)
> [----------] 2 tests from FlagsFileTest (18 ms total)
> 
> [----------] Global test environment tear-down
> [==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. (23 ms total)
> [  PASSED  ] 2 tests.
> PS C:\mesos> .\build\3rdparty\stout\tests\Debug\stout-tests.exe 
> --gtest_filter="*PathTest*"
> Note: Google Test filter = *PathTest*-
> [==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case.
> [----------] Global test environment set-up.
> [----------] 2 tests from PathTest
> [ RUN      ] PathTest.Absolute
> [       OK ] PathTest.Absolute (1 ms)
> [ RUN      ] PathTest.Comparison
> [       OK ] PathTest.Comparison (0 ms)
> [----------] 2 tests from PathTest (2 ms total)
> 
> [----------] Global test environment tear-down
> [==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. (6 ms total)
> [  PASSED  ] 2 tests.
> 
>   YOU HAVE 4 DISABLED TESTS
> 
> PS C:\mesos>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff Coffler
> 
>

Reply via email to