-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59453/#review175959
-----------------------------------------------------------



Hmm, is this also violating the convention then?

https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/d225d4d4122e773e2416ba0d0eee653da8ced352/include/mesos/authorizer/acls.proto#L344

What if later we use uncountable nouns?

FWIW when the rest of the ACLs read pretty natural to me, either the entity is 
a list of values, or the concept itself is plural (e.g., flags).

- Jiang Yan Xu


On May 24, 2017, 1:12 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59453/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 24, 2017, 1:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Greg Mann, Michael Park, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Renames the field `RegisterAgent.agent` to `RegisterAgent.agents` in
> order to come make it consistent with other ACLs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/acls.proto 
> ae0b1ea2e6417d186b1606542d75f3a20e0811db 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 89aaf4b712d337d519445c922606789c334e5101 
>   src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp 32aa6ac4db7854507127ea2fb88b3e92daa277c0 
>   src/tests/master_authorization_tests.cpp 
> e4233c19b1d9e3e2734259503d0daec4ce243667 
>   src/tests/script.cpp 791d331d6bdf178098b2ce0dfb185f9128632459 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59453/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to