> On May 30, 2017, 1:55 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
> > Lines 168 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59254/diff/3/?file=1734798#file1734798line168>
> >
> >     Can you use a PID rather than a UPID?

Sure. FWIW I copied it from 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/55e7ea5ed788acb0e4f810dd4575a5a4479520d1/src/authentication/http/combined_authenticator.cpp#L275


> On May 30, 2017, 1:55 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp
> > Lines 176 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59254/diff/3/?file=1734798#file1734798line176>
> >
> >     Did you need the explicit return type of the lambda?

I tried not to use it but failed.


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59254/#review176348
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 30, 2017, 11:12 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59254/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2017, 11:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, James Peach, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This also gets rid of the old "batch" (interval-based) allocation concept 
> because we now
> use the term to describe the grouping of all pending allocation candidates in 
> an allocation run.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 123f97cf495bff0f822838e09df0d88818f04da6 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 5511bf6ce8c866c8a8436595f5b3eb1ef81c999f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59254/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to