-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59664/#review176468
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




ahh, seems like the `Executor`/`Framework` struct are here. Moving them all 
into a single review along with the `Slave` changes might be a good idea.


src/slave/slave.hpp
Lines 838-839 (original), 838-839 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59664/#comment249826>

    Move it closer to the constructor now that it does not need to be private 
anymore?


- Anand Mazumdar


On May 30, 2017, 11:16 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59664/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2017, 11:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is for `Executor` and `Framework` class in slave.hpp.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 77fb93abc701cd34b69c75b6219c219fdb784a67 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59664/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to