-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59464/#review178543
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




LGTM.  I can add the comment mentioned below before committing.


src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.hpp
Lines 327-328 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59464/#comment252597>

    It's important enough to add a comment here about the counter resolution.  
This number will go up once per task, rather than once per artifact.
    
    So if 1 task asks for 10 artifacts, the total number of fetches is 1.  If 1 
to 10 of those artifacts fail to fetch, the total number of failures is also 1.



src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp
Lines 68-78 (original), 70-78 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59464/#comment252596>

    This change isn't strictly related to the metrics, so it could be moved 
elsewhere.


- Joseph Wu


On June 9, 2017, 11:55 a.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59464/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 9, 2017, 11:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7524
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7524
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add the Fetcher metrics to track the number of fetch requests
> sent to the Fetcher (`containerizer/fetcher/task_fetches_total`)
> and the number of errors reported by the Fetcher
> (`containerizer/fetcher/task_fetches_failed`).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.hpp 
> efeadbf4b7804ea4c1e443d1e5212e303796ace4 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp 
> 770cad3e046e8a6d58b6bc9176eb7ecdbd340db4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59464/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Fedora 25)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to