Thanks.
Can you please help to point out which ticket that fixed it? I am interested 
with code changes as well.

Regards,
Haijiang
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 9:21 AM, Andrew Schwartzmeyer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> It means that it is fixed for Mesos entirely, in code. I rewrote all our use 
> of the Windows APIs to use the Unicode and long path supporting versions 
> exclusively, with a long path helper to pass the correctly formatted paths to 
> the APIs.
> 
> The only caveat is that tasks which do not support long paths need to have 
> the agent use a short working directory so that the task is run in a short 
> path. But all the Mesos code itself now supports long  paths automatically, 
> with zero system configuration :)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017, 6:07 PM Haijiang Chen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Does it mean that the Windows Long path will be fixed somewhere in the 
> installation?
> 
> Thanks,
> Haijiang
> > On 11 Jul 2017, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Schwartzmeyer <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/60758/ <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60758/>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Review request for mesos, Joseph Wu and Li Li.
> >
> >
> > Repository: mesos
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > The list of individual components was also removed for clarity.
> > Developers should either install the entire workload (which is confirmed
> > sufficient), or know their environment well enough to choose specific
> > components. Furthermore, the list of available components changes
> > frequently enough that maintaining this list becomes difficult.
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >  docs/windows.md <http://windows.md/> 
> > d596158b1f5dadddcf28a8675f260924caf33547
> >
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60758/diff/1/ 
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60758/diff/1/>
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> >

Reply via email to