----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/#review185916 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch! Reviews applied: [62446, 62445, 62444, 62161, 62160] Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 62161 Error: 2017-09-21 19:42:25 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/62161/diff/raw/ [1724/1724] -> "62161.patch" [1] error: missing binary patch data for '3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz' error: binary patch does not apply to '3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz' error: 3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz: patch does not apply Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Reviewbot/19500/console - Mesos Reviewbot On Sept. 20, 2017, 5:07 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 20, 2017, 5:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Check whether the versions of libprotobuf used by mesos > and by maven are different, which will lead to a > compile-time failure that may be hard to understand > for those not familiar with maven. > > > Diffs > ----- > > configure.ac 92bc1aa5f9604e3b2b678225a57622cd2eb8679a > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Benno Evers > >
