----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/#review187906 -----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it! docs/containerizer-internals.md Lines 152 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/#comment264974> I'd remove not supported docs/containerizer-internals.md Lines 157-159 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/#comment264973> This is the current semantics, right? Why TBD and not supported? docs/containerizer-internals.md Line 122 (original), 173 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/#comment264970> Not yours, but can you have a link to the isolator lists that we have under `mesos-containerizer.md` - Jie Yu On Oct. 13, 2017, 12:23 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 13, 2017, 12:23 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Benjamin Mahler, Artem Harutyunyan, > Jie Yu, Neil Conway, Qian Zhang, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6335 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6335 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This patch adds a table showing the current semantics > that the linux launcher supports namespaces for top > level and nested container. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/containerizer-internals.md 5e4f349fbad4429ab7629d0038445d7950787daa > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54073/diff/4/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested by gist view. Here is the link: > > https://github.com/Gilbert88/mesos/blob/31f7340976cb71951501bd77c5f6b777c20530e0/docs/containerizer-internals.md#linux-namespaces > > > Thanks, > > Gilbert Song > >
