-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63279/#review189363
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/check_tests.cpp
Line 80 (original), 80 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63279/#comment266395>

    Nit: Please fix commit message:
    
    `Realistically, the safe mimimum is 512 MB of.`
    
    Of what? (Memory, obviously, but please fix.)


- Jeff Coffler


On Oct. 26, 2017, 4:40 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63279/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 26, 2017, 4:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Akash Gupta, Alexander Rukletsov, Jeff Coffler, 
> Gaston Kleiman, Jie Yu, John Kordich, Joseph Wu, and Li Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6690
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6690
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Unfortunately, due to PowerShell's resource usage as a .NET program, on
> Windows 32 MB is not enough memory to run these tests. One instance of
> PowerShell takes > 128 MB, and two instances take > 256 MB.
> Realistically, the safe minimum is 512 MB of.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/check_tests.cpp d3ffc0b0204d021f1ed734ece189d0e3a3fd8844 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63279/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Built and ran `mesos-tests.exe` on Windows repeatedly, verified all tests 
> still pass consistently (likewise for `stout` and `libprocess` tests.
> 
> ~~Currently verifying no breaks on Linux.~~ Built and ran tests on Linux.
> 
> NOTE: There are more check tests that are currently disabled for Windows, 
> that I think should be enabled, but did immediately work for me, so I've left 
> them disabled to unblock myself. Similarly, I would ideally like to port the 
> balloon example framework, and use that to prove the effectiveness of the job 
> object memory hard-cap. Having not yet ported it though, I manually verified 
> the effectiveness of the new isolators by launching test CPU and memory test 
> tasks on a deployed cluster my these changes (and the fact that PowerShell 
> OOM'ed was a nice verification too).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> 
>

Reply via email to