-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#review189556
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/validation.cpp
Lines 2279 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#comment266686>

    Since the implementations of the validations for 
`CreateVolume/DestroyVolume` and `CreateBlock/DestroyBlock` are identical I 
wonder whether it makes sense to instead introduce two reusable basic 
validation functions instead of four. We could still expose four functions to 
users.



src/master/validation.cpp
Lines 2285 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#comment266684>

    nit: `error->message`.



src/master/validation.cpp
Lines 2296-2297 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#comment266682>

    I feel this would be better handled with a `switch` explicitly naming all 
understood types.



src/master/validation.cpp
Lines 2311 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#comment266685>

    nit: `error->message`.



src/master/validation.cpp
Lines 2318-2319 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/#comment266683>

    I feel this would be better handled with a `switch` explicitly naming all 
understood types.


- Benjamin Bannier


On Oct. 29, 2017, 4:47 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 29, 2017, 4:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Gaston Kleiman, Greg Mann, and 
> Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> (This is based on https://reviews.apache.org/r/61946)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/validation.hpp f4925752f20ae8ca4de1d9b4a3d5ffc394db9585 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 42f5742386b59a983f7caaf3400c82b7ef4f8bbb 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp 
> 7da1be5233444aded64263d4a763fe2967459042 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63355/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to