-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63273/#review189966
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows/os.hpp
Lines 793 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63273/#comment267213>

    Do you want to start at 4 here instead? It looks like PID 0 on Windows is 
the `Idle` process and PID 4 is the `System` process. You could cut down on 
iteration too by incrementing in multiples of 4. It seems that both thread IDs 
and process IDs are multiples of 4 
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20080228-00/?p=23283/
    
    They do mention that you should not rely on this behavior which is too bad. 
If you could always assume this you could reduce your cycles here.


- Aaron Wood


On Nov. 2, 2017, 8:40 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63273/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 2, 2017, 8:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Aaron Wood, Akash Gupta, Jeff Coffler, Jie Yu, John 
> Kordich, Joseph Wu, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Returns a `set<Process>` for all the processes in a job object.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows/os.hpp 
> 09ddec6d69472cd13b453fe1a77fdbe343fc23c8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63273/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> 
>

Reply via email to