> On Nov. 3, 2017, 10:19 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/resource_provider/message.hpp
> > Lines 42 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/63491/diff/1/?file=1878544#file1878544line42>
> >
> >     I'm tempted to use `UUID` here instead of `string`, but we would 
> > probably just end up converting it back immediately in the agent before it 
> > gets sent to master, so perhaps it's not worth it. What do you think?

I went for a `string` here since a `UUID` cannot be default-constructed, but 
using a `UUID` turned out to work perfectly fine. Thanks for the suggestion!


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63491/#review190064
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 6, 2017, 1:38 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63491/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 6, 2017, 1:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chun-Hung Hsiao, Jie Yu, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch surfaces this information to resource provider manager
> users like the agent. In a later patch we will modify the agent to
> forward this information to the master.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/resource_provider/manager.cpp 11f890156f0fd099f8a97b07cdc458a0726ee78e 
>   src/resource_provider/message.hpp 3c7c3f2baeb726e04edd6ffbb9784699d7afe521 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 9c2db7adf45af4209ecc475d938ce4b77c5a3ab4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63491/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`, additional testing as part of 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63496/.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to