> On Dec. 7, 2017, 7:47 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > src/messages/messages.proto > > Line 714 (original), 714 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/diff/1/?file=1910528#file1910528line714> > > > > Should we change this to > > `optional bytes resource_version_uuid`? > > Benjamin Bannier wrote: > I we pass agent information as a `ResourceProvider` this field can go > away.
I changed this field to only contain a single value in https://reviews.apache.org/r/64430/. - Benjamin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/#review193148 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 8, 2017, 1:17 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 8, 2017, 1:17 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jan Schlicht. > > > Bugs: MESOS-8312 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8312 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The added fields will allow us to explicitly surface resource > provider-related information in the master. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/messages/messages.proto 7ab07d7a78210f4a6f418458b1484d9301710dd3 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Bannier > >
