-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66218/#review200062
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 4169-4184 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66218/#comment280701>

    This is not a `set` operation but a `hashset` operation, so the comments 
are incorrect. Could you experiment on adding this operaton in 
`stout/hashset.hpp` and see if it works?


- Chun-Hung Hsiao


On March 27, 2018, 6:36 a.m., Zhitao Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66218/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 27, 2018, 6:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chun-Hung Hsiao, Gaston Kleiman, and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4965
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4965
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, `slave::syncCheckpointedResources` implementation will
> delete a persistent volume using `Resources::contains` check, which
> could cause a resized volume being deleted. The function was rewritten
> to compare `set_difference` between old and new paths for all persistent
> volumes and perform creation/deletion accordingly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp e76daabad0d2d68aa42d1da809d4a23459eaaacb 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66218/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhitao Li
> 
>

Reply via email to